@article{oai:shokei.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000083,
 author = {宮澤, 志保 and ミヤザワ, シホ and 岩崎, 祥一 and イワサキ, ショウイチ and Miyazawa, Shiho and Iwasaki, Syoich},
 journal = {尚絅学院大学紀要, Research reports of Shokei Gakuin College},
 month = {Jan},
 note = {Previous studies（MacLeod, Mathews & Tata, 1986 ; Mogg and Bradley, 2002）suggested that a small dot could be detected faster when it followed a threatening stimulus than when it followed neutral or positive stimuli. These studies suggested that participants automatically allocate their attention to the spatial location of fear-related stimuli. Some of these studies suggested that there is a visual field difference in the effect of threatening stimuli （Fox, 2002）. However, there were few studies that compared within field and between-field effect of attentional capture since most of them employed only two locations （one for each visual field）, thus confounding the validity （which is determined by the relationship between threatening stimulus and probe） and the visual field of probe. We investigated this issues and the effect of participants' anxiety level on the degree of attentional capture., 11, KJ00005302079, 論文, Article},
 pages = {121--128},
 title = {The effect of anxiety on attentional capture by negative emotion.},
 volume = {55},
 year = {2008}
}